Anomalies evolution (Quality Indicators)-. These indicators should be produced monthly by WP6 (Automated queries to Bugzilla).

It will be useful to get too the percentage of anomalies resolution time in each classes of time resolution range (low, medium, high).

Those indicators will be produced monthly, but it should be possible to get them on demand.

Done

A WP2/WP3 proposal for web services could be found at:http://edms.cern.ch/document/364409

Dev Guide- update:

·        Compiler version. Yannick should give some examples and specifies that it is not the only way to use it.

·          Cron job (Diana)

·           Unit.d location (German)

·          RFC 2606 (Abdeslem)

A first draft of Bugzilla bug’s report procedure has been provided and agreed: https://edms.cern.ch/document/386113.

Quality indicators specifications (QoS): A first draft has been provided by QAR1: https://edms.cern.ch/document/386039

The final implementation plan will be delivered by David.

Done

Release procedure & release checklist:

A release procedure checklist has been provided by Erwin & Gabriel (05/06/2003): https://edms.cern.ch/document/387659

The quality group member of each WP monitors the progress and reports to the WP mgr. Before an integration slot starts, the QAR informs the QAG about the requirements adherence through the release checklist.

It has to be delivered on the day the integration slot for your WP starts (see the TB3 release plan: https://edms.cern.ch/document/382573)

We received the QA checklist from:

VOMS- https://edms.cern.ch/document/404428

LCMAPS- https://edms.cern.ch/document/404431

RLS-http://cern.ch/edg-wp2/release2.1/index.html#quality

Preparation of QAG presentation at Heidelberg:

QAG report:

https://edms.cern.ch/document/405143

Performance indicators:
https://edms.cern.ch/document/386039